This is a monthly electronic magazine for anyone who wants to be a better leader, coach, facilitator, or simply, to tune up their people skills. It is a complimentary publication, devoted to the next evolution of Quality Thinking.
Publisher: © Key Associates, 2015 ISSN # 1545-8873
“Performance appraisals are numbers laid over opinion.” – John Dowd, Quality Consultant
Dr. W. Edwards Deming considered evaluation of performance, merit rating, or annual review “a deadly disease in American business.” He maintained that performance appraisals (PA’s) should be eliminated because they: (a) are designed based on flawed assumptions; (b) have a damaging effect on collaboration and systems improvement, and (c) are a barrier to pride and joy in work.
Classic performance appraisals are flawed because:
Don Berwick MD (1989) writes, “Practically no system of measurement – at least none that measures people’s performance – is robust enough to survive the fear of those who are measured. Most measurement tools eventually come under the control of those studied, and in their fear such people do not ask what measurement can tell them, but rather how they can make it safe. The inspector says, ‘I will find out if you are deficient.’ The subject replies, ‘I will therefore prove I am not deficient’ – and seeks not understanding, but escape.” When there is a win/lose atmosphere, when ratings are artificially scarce, systems are squeezed and circumvented for individual gain. The appraisal then encourages mediocrity, by setting safe goals that can be easily achieved.
Peter Sholtes gives a marvelous performance in the film, The Case Against Performance Appraisal (1988). He cajoles the audience, wondering what to replace PA with. “If you take out an appendix, must you replace it with something? If you quit smoking, must you put something else burning in your mouth?”
Everyone benefits from helpful feedback, not judgment. Many of our QI clients eventually separated pay from performance, dropped ratings and rankings, but kept the anecdotal feedback, which the employees enjoyed. They tied raises to the overall performance of the organization. At the Center for Continuous Improvement, each of us collected our own data on process performance, gathered feedback from our clients, made our self-evaluation, and put forth a learning plan.
Inspect your current appraisal systems for toxicity. Make sure they are structured as educational and not top-down or akin to going to the school principal’s office. Regular and routine feedback should be provided throughout the year. At the time of scheduled feedback, there should be no surprises.
Experiment with different ways to reward people; try some of these other methods. Have logic between what you believe and how you pay. If you must reward with pay, recognize and celebrate teams who exhibit stewardship, learning, and continuous improvement. Support intrinsic motivation – with gratitude, recognition, and celebration. Ask your employees for their self-appraisal.
copyright ©2015 by dr. m. k. key on behalf of key associates
home Home Page for Dr. Key and Key Associates | keyzines Keyzines | publications Publications | videos Videos | products/services Products/Services | clients Clients | about About Dr. Key and Key Associates | contact Contact Dr. Key